Supreme Court confirms that employers are not required to provide justification for termination without cause

9 June 2023 1 min read

By Juliana Nunes

At a glance

  • The Federal Supreme Court in Brazil has rendered a decision confirming that employers do not need to present justification for terminations without cause.

In 1997, an action was filed to challenge the constitutionality of a 1996 Presidential Decree that excluded Brazil from those countries that ratified The Termination of Employment Convention (Convention 158) of the International Labour Organisation (ILO). ILO Convention 158 protects employees from unjustified terminations.

Through a Presidential Decree, effective November 1997, former President Fernando Henrique confirmed that Convention 158 would not be in effect in Brazil. In the same year, union bodies and confederations representing agricultural employees filed the Federal Supreme Court challenge. Employers’ bodies filed a separate action to confirm the validity of the decree.

After many years of discussion, on 26 May 2023, Justices from the Federal Supreme Court decided that they cannot invalidate the decree signed by a former president, such that Brazil remains out of the list of countries that have ratified ILO Convention 158. 

In practice, this means that employers in Brazil do not have to demonstrate reasons that led them to terminate an employee without cause.

More to explore

Ontario Court of Appeal enforces employment standards minimum termination clause

Ontario Court of Appeal enforces employment standards minimum termination clause

In a recent decision, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld a motion judge’s decision to strike a claim that challenged the enforceability of a termination clause.

US Supreme Court denies interim reinstatement of National Labor Relations Board member

US Supreme Court denies interim reinstatement of National Labor Relations Board member

A recent Supreme Court stayin Trump v. Wilcox leaves key questions about presidential authority over the NLRB unresolved.

An employer's right to extend probationary periods: Analysis of Ann Chiamaka Nwanguma v Artee Industries limited & Ors

An employer's right to extend probationary periods: Analysis of Ann Chiamaka Nwanguma v Artee Industries limited & Ors

The National Industrial Court of Nigeria held that probationary periods in employment contracts are fixed and non-extendable.

A proposed New York bill would impose restrictions on severance agreements

A proposed New York bill would impose restrictions on severance agreements

A new bill would provide protection for all workers when reviewing severance agreements.

Severance pay and resignation: High Court puts the debate to rest

Severance pay and resignation: High Court puts the debate to rest

The High Court has clarified that employees must be at least 65 years old to receive severance pay on regisnation or retirement.

Unjustified absence of a certain period will now be considered a resignation (update)

Unjustified absence of a certain period will now be considered a resignation (update)

The Italian Parliament recently approved a law stating that an employee who is unjustifiably absent for longer than a set period will be considered to have resigned.